Reform and Strengthen U.S. Foreign Aid

A year ago, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) was dismantled, halting numerous global programs including essential humanitarian aid. This event reflects a broader trend where last year, the U.S. and other major donor countries like Canada and the United Kingdom decreased aid budgets by a historic 23%, equating to $40 billion. These reductions could result in over 9.4 million preventable deaths by 2030.

Foreign aid remains a crucial U.S. foreign policy tool. As former leaders in global aid, we have witnessed how U.S. assistance can halt deadly disease outbreaks, feed hungry children, and save lives during natural disasters, conflicts, or crises. Such aid not only protects Americans, it strengthens U.S. global leadership, fosters job creation, and establishes new trade partners, while potentially saving taxpayer money.

Nonetheless, the situation today is dire. The dramatic budget cuts and closure of USAID highlight the shortcomings and underwhelming impact of foreign aid. It’s time to critically evaluate funding routes, ensuring that it serves U.S. interests by pinpointing programs that do so and promoting public support.

Innovating in aid delivery is imperative to avoid wastage and bolster self-reliance over time. Additionally, re-establishing bipartisan support for foreign assistance is necessary, embedding it as a measure of program success alongside effectiveness and accountability. By prioritizing U.S. interests, refining delivery methods, and gaining broad public backing, the U.S. can strengthen this important tool of national security into the 21st century.

“any retreat from our responsibilities endangers both our national ideals and our national interests.” — Ronald Reagan

Despite political divisions in Washington, American citizens generally agree on the importance of foreign aid for global leadership. A recent poll by Echelon Insights reveals a majority (54%) across political affiliations support foreign aid. Furthermore, 80% advocate for reforming and enhancing international assistance.

Support grows when Americans consider specific aid programs with effective use of resources. For instance, 90% support humanitarian relief and disease prevention programs, while global health and economic development initiatives receive 84% and 81% approval, respectively.

Given this backing, we are co-chairing a new bipartisan Commission on the Future of Foreign Assistance. This group includes former members of Congress and senior officials with extensive foreign policy experience, supported by think tanks like the American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings Institution. Our goal is to engage a wide range of Americans and international leaders in reform efforts. The commission will conduct an honest review of past shortcomings and reasons for cuts to foreign aid.

New, innovative strategies are needed to empower development and provide urgent support to millions affected by conflict and crisis, bolstering both U.S. security and global safety. Although the challenge is significant, neglect is not an option. As retired General James Mattis warned Congress, “If you don’t fully fund the State Department, then I need to buy more ammunition.” Creativity, honesty, and strong political commitment are essential, and this commission aims to leverage these resources effectively. We trust in American ingenuity and optimism to ensure success.

David Beasley previously served as South Carolina’s governor and led the World Food Program. Ben Cardin, a former Maryland senator, was chair of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee.