Alberta Separatists Under Scrutiny for Alleged Deal with U.S.

Alberta Separatists: Allegations and Reactions

Alberta separatists face new scrutiny after accusations that they offered the U.S. access to natural resources for political support. The Globe and Mail investigated claims that Alberta Prosperity Project (APP) members met with U.S. State Department officials last year seeking backing, proposing oil royalty payments, fresh water, and railway land access in return.

APP co-founder Dennis Modry reportedly presented a document outlining benefits of Alberta sovereignty to the U.S. However, APP lawyer Jeff Rath denied this and called Modry “delusional.” Several Canadian MPs have expressed concern, calling for an emergency debate to examine these claims.

Referendum and Inquiry Calls

Less than two weeks remain before Alberta’s independence referendum. Public Interest Alberta has requested a formal inquiry into potential foreign interference, suspecting collaboration with American operatives. When Newsweek reported on meetings between separatists and Washington last January, the White House stated officials met various civil groups but offered no support.

The Globe’s findings do not confirm any agreement between APP and U.S. representatives. Newsweek contacted APP, the White House, and the State Department for comment.

Reported Meetings and Discussions

APP campaigners reportedly met with U.S. State Department officials thrice last year—April 22, September 29, and December 16—arranged by Rath. Modry claimed they suggested U.S. assistance for Alberta’s transition to independence, potentially repaid by railway land access or oil royalties.

Modry also mentioned proposed access to Alberta’s resources and a potential switch to the U.S. dollar. He did not advocate for Alberta to become a U.S. state, although some separatists support the idea amid Trump’s prior endorsement.
Rath disputed Modry’s claims, stating discussions were broadly about Alberta’s independence aspirations.

In January, Rath said the U.S. showed enthusiasm for an independent Alberta, emphasizing a stronger relationship with Trump’s administration than with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s.

Canadian Response

Canadian MPs expressed concern following recent reports. Conservative Alberta MP Dane Lloyd, leading the party’s response to the referendum campaign, stated, “Nobody has the right to promise away Alberta’s birthright.”

New Democratic Party MP Heather McPherson sought an emergency debate in the House of Commons, which was denied. She emphasized Canadian sovereignty and criticized efforts to compromise it for foreign support. Carney’s office reiterated an expectation for U.S. respect towards Canadian sovereignty concerning the Alberta referendum.

The Upcoming Alberta Referendum

In May, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a referendum on October 19. It includes a question on whether Alberta should remain in Canada or commence a legal process towards a binding provincial independence referendum.

Some separatists criticized this move, arguing it prolongs timelines for political gain. Rath suggested Smith’s plan forces independence supporters to back her premiership in 2027.

Smith advocates for Alberta remaining in Canada, aiming not to silence the voices seeking independence.

Reasons for Alberta’s Separatist Sentiment

Alberta and other Western provinces feel undervalued by Ottawa. As a major economic player with oil and gas, Alberta perceives itself as underrepresented, particularly concerning environmental regulations impacting its industry.

Labour party leader Cameron Davies highlighted Alberta’s potential and resource wealth, advocating for self-determination. Carney collaborates to build an oil pipeline to the Pacific, possibly easing Alberta’s dissatisfaction. He presented this project in cooperation with Alberta as a sign of united effort, aiming for final regulations by September 2027.