Republican Lawmaker Opposes Funding for Trump’s Arch Near Arlington

Senior House Republican Mike Simpson is opposing plans to fund President Donald Trump’s proposed triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery. Simpson, a key figure on the House Appropriations Committee, expressed his reluctance to allocate Pentagon funds for the project. Trump argued the arch could also house military equipment.

“We need military funding for essential purposes,” Simpson stated. He expressed concern about the military budget and indicated he would not allocate funds to the arch if given the choice.

The administration plans to build the 250-foot structure between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery. The project faces ongoing legal challenges and funding questions. Simpson’s opposition is notably a rare disagreement from within Trump’s party.

GOP Pushback

Simpson’s remarks hold weight due to his influence on spending decisions. Republicans have generally backed Trump’s vision for this high-profile project. Trump envisions the monument as a landmark celebrating America’s 250th anniversary.

In a February NBC News interview, Trump stated: “We’re doing one that will be more magnificent and larger than the Arc de Triomphe in Paris.” Simpson insisted Congress should have a say if appropriated funds are used for the arch, aligning with critics, including veterans groups and congressional Democrats.

White House Defends Project

The White House defended continuing with the project. Spokesman Davis Ingle described it as becoming “one of the most iconic landmarks.” Ingle said it would enhance visitor experiences and honor American veterans. He noted that both public and private funds would finance the project, which is expected to be completed by Trump’s term’s end.

A White House official mentioned some work will start without final approvals, while efforts to gain necessary ones are ongoing.

Military Role Raises Concerns

Trump revealed that the arch could also serve as a military facility. He mentioned housing drones, snipers, and ammunition as a national security measure. This expanded the project’s initial purpose.

The announcement sparked criticism, including from Democrat Representative Don Beyer. Beyer criticized the concept due to its proximity to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, calling it “stupid, dangerous, and unworkable.” The proposal intensified debates about requiring further approvals or congressional authorization.

The White House confirmed the Commission of Fine Arts approved the arch, and further review by the National Capital Planning Commission continues.

Press Access Dispute

Simpson also confronted the administration on press access issues. He opposed restricting news organizations, defending the press’s role and access. “The press keeps us honest,” Simpson emphasized.

A White House official defended limiting press access, deeming certain media “Fake News.” Simpson disputed barring press coverage based on coverage disapproval.

Contact Newsweek editors on this story: Jason Lemon and Sam Wilson.