The Role of Mediocre Employees in Autocratic Regimes

Journalists often focus on world leaders, as they set agendas and must be held accountable. However, the individuals implementing these agendas deserve attention too. In autocracies, executing state duties sometimes involves intimidation or torture, raising questions about why someone would choose to become a sinister bureaucrat.

A new article by Amanda Taub delves into research that uncovers intriguing reasons behind this choice.

Argentine security forces in 1982 in Buenos Aires.

Even the most capable autocrats cannot govern alone. Leaders like Vladimir Putin rely on loyal groups, such as Russian oligarchs. Iran depends on the Revolutionary Guards. Viktor Orban’s “electoral autocracy” in Hungary is sustained by judges, enforcers, and business figures. These individuals are crucial to maintaining the regimes.

Autocracies require a network of affiliates who sometimes engage in unsavory tasks. This structure raises the question: what motivates individuals to participate in such regimes? Recent research cited by Taub provides fascinating insights into this complex issue.